|
|
Equal Benefits Alternative Compliance Options Section 11 of the Equal Benefits Program Rules allows the City, in limited circumstances to authorize a contractor to provide eligible employees with a cash equivalent payment in lieu of benefits that are unavailable due to circumstances outside of the contractor's control. The authorization does not relieve the contractor of its obligation to provide all other benefits it offers on an equal basis. Smaller employers (less than 50 employees) who are not participants in a pooled group insurance plan may find it difficult to add domestic partners to an existing health insurance policy, because very few insurance carriers cover domestic partners at the small group level. The City evaluates each request for Reasonable Measures Authorization on a case-by-case basis and decisions are based on such factors as:
Contractors must provide the following information when completing the Equivalent/Alternate Measures Authorization form:
Substantial Compliance (Implementation Delay) Authorization Section 12 of the Equal Benefits Program Rules allows the City to authorize a contractor who anticipates not being able to comply with the equal benefits requirement by the date of its contract with the City to enter into the contract in spite of the implementation delay. This authorization is granted when full implementation of equal benefits is delayed by circumstances outside of a contractor’s control. For example, a city contractor who would like to contract with the City in October 2007 may not be able to make eligibility changes to its health insurance plan until January 1, 2008, the next open enrollment period for that plan. This contractor may apply for Substantial Compliance Authorization, on the grounds of Open Enrollment Delay. If the application is approved, the contractor is cleared to do business with the City, contingent upon its implementation of equal benefits within the timeframe specified. Once the City approves the application, it monitors the contractor for evidence of successful fulfillment of the terms of authorization and requires complete documentary proof of equal benefits compliance upon expiration of the authorized timeframe for delay. A contractor’s failure to provide equal benefits: 1) within the timeframe allotted under Substantial Compliance Authorization; and 2) to the extent required by its contract with the City, constitutes a material breach of contract. If you need assistance, call us and we can assist you in determining what changes, if any, will be required under the law. Contact Us
|
Resources |
![]() |
![]() |
|