|
Tree Blog
The Dying Trees
By John Floberg, Cascade Land Conservancy
Our city’s trees are in serious decline. The once vast stretches of mature forest that lined our shores, reached out to the mountain foothills and filled Puget Sound Basin are largely gone. In addition, over the past 150 years virtually all of Seattle’s remnant forests have been logged, giving way to younger forests, particularly of big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) and red alder (Alnus rubra). Now, after decades of passive management, even these forested parklands are in danger of being lost. This threat comes not from development or from the blade of an ax. This threat comes from decades of benign neglect.
Shades of Green
As it turns out, not all green is good. Take a walk in your neighborhood forest. If it’s like most forests in Seattle, just before you enter the trees you’ll find impenetrable thickets of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Once inside the forest, there will likely be a thick carpet of the dull waxy green leaves of English ivy (Hedera helix), spilling out across the forest floor and even reaching into the tree canopy. Though lush and green, these invasive plants and several other new species to the area are replacing all the native plants in the forest, including the trees that make up the forest itself.
Time to Kill
How do these invasive plants kill our trees and other native forest species? Given time, ivy, blackberry and a few other plants will blanket the ground, shutting off light and resources for any other plant to survive, including tree seedlings. Once established on the ground, ivy will surround and climb tree trunks, eventually growing out to branch tips and smothering trees whole. If that wasn’t enough, as the ivy weakens the tree by covering its leaves, it also adds a great deal of weight, with ivy trunks on some trees as thick as a man’s thigh. Once so weakened, winter storms over time can bring down the forest, tree by tree. It is estimated by Seattle Urban Nature that without intervention, 70 percent of Seattle’s forested parklands will be lost in 20 years due to invasive plants due to invasive species.
Turning a New Leaf
The decades of neglecting our forested parklands, decades that have given invasive plants the time to kill, are not the result of malicious intent. We came to realize that many natural areas, if disturbed, are not self-sustaining, but need to be cared for. At times our care of the forest is even like tending a garden, with a time to weed, a time to prepare the soil and a time to plant. And because we now live in a world with many disturbances and many sources of new threats, we need to monitor and maintain our urban forests to keep them healthy.
How we keep our trees from dying, create a vision for the future forest and take tangible steps to achieve that vision will be the subject of our next blog. In acting on this vision, we’ve found it’s not just the forest that returns, but also our sense of shared community and a collective hope that we will together leave the world a better place than we found it.
Share a comment on this blog posting
Comments
Commenter: anonymous, 10/28/08
How do normal forests survive ivy? Do they have some process like deer eating the ivy?
|
Commenter: Becca Fong, Seattle reLeaf public outreach,
11/12/08
The forests of England, Ireland and parts of the Mediterranean are the native habitat for English Ivy (Hedera helix). Those forest ecosystems there have two things that work to keep the ivy under control: 1. The existence of browsing animals and 2. High plant biodiversity
Browsers, like elk and deer, will eat the ivy and keep it from spreading unchecked. They are a control measure in those forests. Though, the high biodiversity of plants in ivy’s native forests is the main factor that keeps English Ivy from becoming the invasive plant that it is in the PNW. High biodiversity means there are more plants that are competing for resources in the forest. So it’s less likely that any one plant will dominate the ecosystem.
In the Pacific Northwest, our forests haven’t evolved in a competitive environment with English Ivy and our native plants and animals are unable to keep it in check. The best line of defense is to remove ivy before it gets established and prevent the introduction of it to our forests.
| Commenter: pdx 10/28/08
What's the oldest and largest tree in Seattle?
How many trees are there in Seattle and what is the most popular one.
In the arborhetum I know the trees are labeled. Is there a list of this anywhere?
| Commenter: Becca Fong, Seattle reLeaf public outreach,
11/12/08
- What’s the oldest and largest tree in Seattle ?
The oldest and largest tree in Seattle is most likely in Seward Park or Schmitz Park . These parks were not logged in the 1800’s like the rest of Seattle . The City has not identified individual trees, but it is a good guess that the trees in these parks will be older than any planted by settlement, as most development in Seattle occurred within the last 100 years. Size does not equal age, however there are also very few trees in Seattle that can compare to the 250 foot Douglas Firs in Seward Park. A good reference for trees of all species is, Trees of Seattle 2 nd edition, by Authur Lee Jacobsen.
- How many trees are there in Seattle and what is the most popular one?
A rough estimate, utilizing the information in the Urban Forest Management Plan, is approximately 1,377,000.
- In the Arboretum I know the trees are labeled. Is there a list of this anywhere?
The Arboretum published a Collection Catalog in 1995. The catalog is a small field guide sized book which had a variety of plants that make up the collection, trees included. It is available for purchase in the Graham Visitor’s Center Gift Shop or for lend at the Elizabeth Miller Library at the Center for Urban Horticulture.
|
|